Text of supreme court opinion on gay marriage

Respondents’ argument that allowing same-sex couples to wed will harm marriage as an institution rests on a counterintuitive view of opposite-sex couples’ decisions about marriage and parenthood. In he told a same-sex couple that he would not create a cake for their wed-ding celebration because of his religious opposition to same-sex mar-riages—marriages that Colorado did not then recognize—but that he would sell them other baked goods, e.g., birthday cakes.

Obergefell v. Hodges | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

Hodges, U.S. () (/ ˈoʊbərɡəfɛl / OH-bər-gə-fel), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court which ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The Supreme Court legalized gay marriage nationwide on Friday in a historic decision.

The justices found that, under the 14th Amendment, states must issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and recognize same-sex unions that have been legally performed in other states. Read the Supreme Court's court decision on gay marriage below. Jim Obergefell and others sued for recognition of their same-sex marriages, which were legal in the states where they were married but illegal in other states.

The denial of marriage impedes many legal rights and privileges, such as adoptions, parental rights, and property transfer. The Court has long held that marriage is a fundamental right. There is dignity in the bond between two men or two women who seek to gay and in their autonomy to make such profound choices. Skip to main content. The petitioners claim the respondents violate the Fourteenth Amendment by denying them the right to marry or to have their marriages, lawfully performed in another state, given full recognition.

Reparations for Slavery. The Tyranny of Petty Coercion. Mistretta v. Just who do we think we are? Constitution Course Start your constitutional learning journey. Himes The Court now holds that same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry. Guidance Regarding Marijuana Enforcement. The text supreme for restraint in administering the strong opinion of substantive due process is a lesson this Court has learned the hard way.

The intimate association protected by this right was central to Griswold v. From their beginning to their most recent page, the annals of human history reveal the transcendent importance of marriage. Address to the United Nations General Assembly. Windsor the U. Kentucky Cases Kentucky case 1: originally Bourke v. Green Party Platform Address at Cairo University.

A New Foundation for the Economy Speech.

Obergefell v. hodges significance

In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. On June 26, in Pavan v. The petitioners are fourteen same-sex couples and two men whose same-sex partners are deceased. Nelson, which dismissed a same-sex couple's marriage claim "for want of a substantial federal question".

VirginiaZablocki v. The court said it was bound by the U. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death.